I wrestled with classifying this mail piece as “For” Sarah Boot, instead of “against” Lori Zapf, since most pieces with negative content are automatically considered “Against”. however, my often stated criteria has been if 50% or more of the flier is against someone than it is “Against”. Here the negative statements and images take up only 25%, so for the sake of consistency, this piece is “For”, not against…
I wrestled with classifying this mail piece as “For” Sarah Boot, instead of “against” Lori Zapf, since most pieces with negative content are automatically considered “Against”. however, my often stated criteria has been if 50% or more of the flier is against someone than it is “Against”. Here the negative statements and images take up only 25%, so for the sake of consistency, this piece is “For”, not against…